Shah government losing its human face
The pursuit of order and efficiency should not impose disproportionate suffering on those least able to bear it.
The pursuit of order and efficiency should not impose disproportionate suffering on those least able to bear it.
Nepal holds a distinctive and largely unstudied cannabis gene pool. Legalisation, if it comes, risks erasing it through hybridisation.
The framing of ‘human-wildlife conflict’ naturalises the problem, obscures the political choices that produce it and shields powerful conservation actors from scrutiny.
If an amendment can fail even when it is procedurally flawless, who decides when that line has been crossed?
His tragedy is not merely a localised incident of a fine gone wrong. It is a symptom of a deeper, more systemic rot in our urban governance.
It is but simple arithmetic. When the expected cost of being wrong exceeds the expected return of being right, sensible people wait.
The government must better engage stakeholders to balance oversight and business viability.
Stolen from classrooms and playgrounds and thrust into conflict, the minors lost their formative years of education, economic mobility and psychological security.
Nepal can reach its goal of becoming a $100 billion economy in five years by adopting innovative tax policies to build a foreign sovereign wealth fund, and by creating a friendly business climate.
Both the government and opposition parties have acted irresponsibly on the constitution amendment process.
The blanket support of the government’s every action, just or unjust, will motivate it to veer into authoritarianism.
Disasters have differential impacts on various groups, but preparedness and responses remain generalised.
More control of RSP chair over party representatives in the executive and legislative is a slippery slope.
Nepal’s constitutional promise will be fulfilled only when the provincial and local levels are genuinely empowered as equal partners in governance.
Digital literacy needs to cease being a voluntary awareness programme and become a formal part of social protection and development policy.
Timely identification of ‘problematic’ animals and engagement of communities in conservation efforts are vital.
Nepal does not have much leverage to retaliate against India’s action. It needs to update and operationalise agreements and address critical trade bottlenecks.
What precisely would a unified left stand for that it does not stand for now, divided?
Instead of honouring due process, the government has taken the populist course of quick delivery at any cost.
Why does heritage in Nepal make headlines only after it has disappeared, or once damage becomes irreversible?