The Ishwar Pokhrel-led committee for the prevention and control of Covid-19 on Thursday made a debacle. Within less than two hours of deciding to allow people to leave the Valley to go back to their homes on Friday and Saturday, a decision that was publicly announced on the Facebook page of the Office of the Prime Minister and Council of Ministers, the decision was swiftly reversed and the Facebook page itself disappeared.

Such ad-hoc decision-making has long been the hallmark of the KP Sharma Oli administration, say political observers, and Thursday’s fiasco was just one more link in the chain.

Though Nepal has not reported any more cases of Covid-19 since the tally reached nine last Saturday, going by the unprecedented spread of the coronavirus in various countries, Nepal continues to face a significant threat. The Oli administration, however, still does not seem to be treating the situation with the gravity it deserves, which reflects in the Pokhrel committee’s decisions, say observers.

The lockdown, enforced since March 24, may have helped control the spread of the disease to a large extent, but experts have long said that it’s not the only solution and that the authorities need to put in place multiple measures to fight the pandemic. Apart from technical steps, one key measure is transparency and the free flow of accurate information regarding the efforts the government is making to fight the disease.

At least two senior bureaucrats told the Post that the entire bureaucracy is suffering under the incoherent and inconsistent decisions taken by various ministers in the Oli Cabinet.

“Things have become increasingly difficult for bureaucrats given the manner in which the political leadership has been handling the situation for the last three months,” one bureaucrat told the Post on condition of anonymity because he feared retribution. “After all, as members of the ‘permanent government’, we are the ones who have to get into damage control. The political leadership tasked with handling the crisis is inept, with no understanding of the ground reality.”

Thursday’s decision to let people leave the Valley for their homes might not have hurt the government much, as thousands of people are stuck in Kathmandu due to the lockdown and are running out of money, food and essentials.

Those familiar with Thursday’s development said the Pokhrel-led committee had just floated the idea if the lockdown should be lifted for those who want to leave the Valley.

“But before the decision was formalised, the media reported about it,” Narayan Bidari, a secretary at the Prime Minister’s Office, told the Post. “For the decision to be formally made, a meeting has to take place and as a member secretary of the Coronavirus Crisis Management Committee, I was supposed to present the agenda at the meeting.”

Bidari said that he was unaware how an issue that was not even discussed in the meeting appeared as a formal decision in the media.

“The Prime Minister’s Office does not even have a Facebook page or Twitter account,” he told the Post.

While Bidari insisted that the Office of the Prime Minister and the Council of Ministers never had a Facebook page, the page itself was a verified account that regularly posted governmental decisions and updates.

Experts, however, say that decision making in the Oli administration has always been problematic and in such times of crisis, opacity and ad hocism could cost the people and the country dearly.

Since the inception of the Oli government, most of its decisions have been myopic, said Geja Sharma Wagle, a political commentator.

“That’s why several of the government decisions were reversed later,” Wagle told the Post. “One recent incident is the scrapping of a deal with a private company for the procurement of medical equipment. In this [Thursday’s] case too, it is apparent that there’s a total lack of coordination among the government agencies.”

According to Wagle, in the kind of governance system Nepal practises, the buck should stop with the prime minister, but Oli has often feigned ignorance when it comes to criticism that his government encounters.

Oli most recently said that he was unaware of the fiasco involving the government’s procurement deal with private company Omni Business Corporate International, but this is an old tactic the prime minister has resorted to often.

Though the government has entrusted the Pokhrel-led committee with the task of handling all issues related to Covid-19, its performance has been questioned since the very beginning.

The committee lacks experts and there is a large representation of politicians, with around half a dozen ministers.

Even ruling Nepal Communist Party members admit poor handling of the situation by the Pokhrel-led committee.

“There is less work and more publicity stunts by this committee,” a standing committee member of the ruling party told the Post on condition of anonymity. “At a time when the committee should have been working on a war footing and coming up with clear decisions, it is creating an embarrassing situation.”

Government officials say that politicians’ advisors too are making things worse. For one, they lack the understanding and second, they are keen to leak information to the media.

“And we have to take the blame,” said the bureaucrat who spoke on condition of anonymity. “Governance is not about quick decisions; it is about informed decisions, and such decisions require adequate homework and coordination with various agencies.”

Ever since the formation of the Oli government, many analysts have questioned the wisdom of the prime minister’s style of working, saying he relies too heavily on a small circle of advisors and favoured ministers.

“Prime Minister Oli has a tendency to work with a close coterie and he trusts only a few people,” said Tara Nath Dahal, chairman of Freedom Forum Nepal, a civil liberty group. “This results in a lack of interaction between Oli, his ministers and party leaders before decisions are made.”

And this lack of coordination manifests in situations like Thursday’s backtracking.

“The nation has been paying the price of Oli’s working style—be it today in a time of crisis or earlier, when the situation was much more conducive for the prime minister to work,” said Dahal.