How Nepali diaspora literature confronts borders and belonging
The question of readership in diasporic literature is important and deserves serious discussion and engagement.
The question of readership in diasporic literature is important and deserves serious discussion and engagement.
Interestingly and remarkably, the focus of every transition is the people and the question of their rights.
Leaders should use their energy, judgement and policies to address the root causes of public frustration and ennui.
Theatre generates energy if it works steadily, staging plays that reflect the spirit of change and transformations in society.
Nepal lacks the strict tradition of student-mentor relationships in classical music, which demand time, patience and devotion.
The urgent issues of ecological catastrophe in Nepal are receiving less priority from the government, political parties and agencies.
It takes time for literary writers to write about the challenges and conditions of creative change.
To incur human misery with actions performed in a rush is a transcendental violation.
The state should address student political affiliations through consensus rather than force.
The Mundhum provides a basis for forming political perspectives among the Kirat people.
If the new government wants to create an exemplary history, it must embrace plurality.
The next government and opposition play vital roles in pulling the country out of difficult times.
Leaders should recognise the hamartia that got the best of them, and work with a sense of trust and respect.
More should be done to include politicians and parties in architectural discourses.
To understand its features, we should take a psychopolitical approach.