Login

Forget Password?
Login With Facebook
Don't Have An Account? Sign Up

Sign Up

Already Have An Account? Login
Read Our Privacy Policy
Back to Login
  • National
  • Politics
  • Valley
  • Opinion
  • Money
  • Sports
  • Culture & Lifestyle

  • National
    • Madhesh Province
    • Lumbini Province
    • Bagmati Province
    • National Security
    • Koshi Province
    • Gandaki Province
    • Karnali Province
    • Sudurpaschim Province
  • Politics
  • Valley
    • Kathmandu
    • Lalitpur
    • Bhaktapur
  • Opinion
    • Columns
    • As it is
    • Letters
    • Editorial
    • Cartoon
  • Money
  • Sports
    • Cricket
    • Football
    • International Sports
  • Culture & Lifestyle
    • Arts
    • Brunch with the Post
    • Movies
    • Life & Style
    • Theater
    • Entertainment
    • Books
    • Fashion
  • Health
  • Food
    • Recipes
  • Travel
  • Investigations
  • Climate & Environment
  • World
  • Science & Technology
  • Interviews
  • Visual Stories
  • Crosswords & Sudoku
  • Horoscope
  • Forex
  • Corrections
  • Letters to the Editor
  • Today's ePaper
Monday, July 28, 2025

Without Fear or FavourUNWIND IN STYLE

22.65°C Kathmandu
Air Quality in Kathmandu: 60
300+Hazardous
0-50Good
51-100Moderate
101-150Unhealty for Sensitive Groups
151-200Unhealthy
201-300Very Unhealthy
Mon, Jul 28, 2025
22.65°C Kathmandu
Air Quality in Kathmandu: 60
  • What's News :

  • Nepal’s EV imports
  • Bagmati assembly turmoil
  • Illegal mining in Kaligandaki river
  • Public smoking ban
  • Bidya Bhandari's comeback

National

Dispute between UML and Speaker continues as House reconvenes

Experts on parliamentary affairs say while the Speaker and the prime minister should take initiatives for dialogue, the UML must also understand that House obstruction is not going to offer a solution. Dispute between UML and Speaker continues as House reconvenes
CPN-UML lawmakers obstruct the House of Representatives as the winter session of Parliament convened on Tuesday. Elite Joshi/TKP
bookmark
  • facebook
  • twitter
  • Whatsapp
  • mail
Binod Ghimire
Published at : December 16, 2021
Updated at : December 16, 2021 05:31
Kathmandu

Thirteen meetings were held in the previous session of the House of Representatives that lasted 51 days.

With around 50 bills to endorse, including the ordinances, the session would have been a busy one. But the entire session ended without endorsing a single bill, except for those related to the budget, owing to the continuous obstruction from the lawmakers in the opposition.

The CPN-UML lawmakers obstructed the parliamentary meetings demanding that Speaker Agni Sapkota relieve 14 of its lawmakers, who later went on to form the CPN (Unified Socialist), of their position.

On August 17, the UML had written to Speaker Agni Sapkota to revoke the parliamentarian status of 14 of its leaders including Madhav Kumar Nepal after they stood against the decision of the party chair and the then Prime Minister KP Sharma Oli to dissolve the House of Representatives.

The dissenting UML members led by leader Nepal registered the CPN (Unified Socialist) on August 25. Four days later, Speaker Sapkota finally responded to the UML’s demand. He refused to take action against the 14 lawmakers saying they had already formed a new party, angering the UML.

The UML argues that Sapkota supported the party split by refusing to take action against the dissident lawmakers until they formed a new party. Sapkota, however, maintains that he had 15 days to take a decision on the matter and he had decided within the deadline.

With the UML lawmakers in a bitter dispute with the Speaker, the House proceedings were held hostage.

Now the same dispute threatens to affect the 10th session of Parliament, which commenced on Tuesday. The UML has said it won’t let the House function unless its demands are addressed.

“The obstruction won’t be lifted until the Speaker’s unlawful decision is corrected,” said Bishal Bhattarai, the party’s chief whip. “The Speaker doesn’t listen and the Supreme Court hasn’t conducted hearings on our writ petition. We have no option but to put our grievances before the House.”

The Speaker on Tuesday called a meeting of the Business Advisory Committee of Parliament, where he, Minister for Law, Justice and Parliamentary Affairs Dilendra Prasad Badu and representatives from various political parties requested the UML to allow the House to function. But the UML was adamant.

The UML has filed a writ petition challenging the Speaker’s decision. But no hearing has taken place on the issue.

“The UML wants the House to decide on the matter that is sub judice in court. How is that even possible?” an aide to the Speaker told the Post on condition of anonymity. “It seems the UML doesn't want to resolve the matter.”

Article 105 of the Constitution of Nepal says no discussion shall be held in either House of the federal parliament on any matters that may adversely impact the dispensation of justice on any cases that are sub judice in any courts of Nepal.

Rule 21 of the Parliament Regulations says except when the House is discussing a proposal to scrap any decision by the House or Speaker, no decision by the House and the Speaker can be criticised.

The UML leaders, however, blame the Speaker and the government for not taking a serious initiative to resolve the matter.

Bhattarai said they are always ready for a dialogue and discussion to find a solution.

“The Speaker and the prime minister should be conducting a one-on-one meeting with us,” he said. “It can be a breakthrough in ending the stalemate.”

It’s not that Speaker Sapkota and Prime Minister Sher Bahadur Deuba didn’t take any initiative.

Sapkota on September 13 called an all-party meeting and Deuba had done the same on September 30 to discuss the House obstruction and seek a solution. However, the UML boycotted both the meetings saying it won’t be participating in any meetings attended by leaders from the Unified Socialist. The two meetings, held in the absence of UML representatives, failed to find a solution.

Experts on parliamentary affairs say while the UML is not wrong when it says the Speaker and the prime minister should take the initiative, it also should act responsibly in the House.

“House obstruction is not a solution to the problem. As the largest party, the UML must understand it is barring the representatives of the sovereign people from presenting their voices,” Som Bahadur Thapa, a former secretary at the Parliament Secretariat, told the Post. “Dialogue should be prioritised over House obstruction.”

In 1995, the UML, which was in the opposition, obstructed the lower house for 56 days, questioning the impartiality of then Speaker Ram Chandra Poudel. It agreed to allow it to function later.

The House of Representatives is a platform for the opposition to keep the government in check. Experts say the UML, by obstructing the parliamentary proceedings, is not playing the role of a responsible opposition.

Tara Nath Ranabhat, a former Speaker, says all sides—the UML, Speaker and the government—must present themselves responsibly as the people are closely watching them.

“The Speaker and the prime minister should increase their engagement with the UML to smoothen the House proceedings. All three parties must understand democracy cannot flourish keeping the House hostage,” he told the Post.


Binod Ghimire

Binod Ghimire covers parliamentary affairs and human rights for The Kathmandu Post. Since joining the Post in 2010, he has reported primarily on social issues, focusing on education and transitional justice.


Related News

Sudurpaschim Chief Minister Shah to seek vote of confidence on Thursday
Sixteen members of Hayu family missing in Sindhuli for four days
LSP rift deepens after Pandey reappointed minister in Lumbini
Mayor launches peaceful protest demanding bamboo promotion policy
Floods block Tamor Corridor and Mechi Highway in Panchthar
Maoist Centre leaders clash at party office in Kanchanpur

Most Read from National

Nepal bans Telegram over online fraud concerns
Missing sisters found dead in Bhaktapur
Open-air jet repair exposes Kathmandu airport’s limitations
US pulls MCC Nepal Compact back from the brink
Cabinet declares Madhesh Province a disaster crisis zone

Editor's Picks

Kailash pilgrims breathe new life into Nepal’s mountain economy
Pressure groups are dictating lawmaking
Indians paying by QR in Nepal for a year but Nepalis still lack access in India
UML weighs binning age, term limits amid Oli-Bhandari rivalry
Law in the works to check officials’ conflict of interest

E-PAPER | July 28, 2025

  • Read ePaper Online
×
ABOUT US
  • About the Post
  • Masthead
  • Editorial Standards & Integrity
  • Workplace Harassment Policy
  • Privacy Policy
READ US
  • Home Delivery
  • ePaper
CONTACT US
  • Write for the Post
  • Letters to the Editor
  • Advertise in the Post
  • Work for the Post
  • Send us a tip
INTERACT WITH US
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
OUR SISTER PUBLICATIONS
  • eKantipur
  • saptahik
  • Nepal
  • Nari
  • Radio Kantipur
  • Kantipur TV
© 2025 www.kathmandupost.com
  • Privacy Policy
Top