• National
  • Politics
  • Valley
  • Opinion
  • Money
  • Sports
  • Culture & Lifestyle

  • National
    • Madhesh Province
    • Lumbini Province
    • Bagmati Province
    • National Security
    • Koshi Province
    • Gandaki Province
    • Karnali Province
    • Sudurpaschim Province
  • Politics
  • Valley
    • Kathmandu
    • Lalitpur
    • Bhaktapur
  • Opinion
    • Columns
    • As it is
    • Letters
    • Editorial
    • Cartoon
  • Money
  • Sports
    • Cricket
    • Football
    • International Sports
  • Culture & Lifestyle
    • Arts
    • Brunch with the Post
    • Movies
    • Life & Style
    • Theater
    • Entertainment
    • Books
    • Fashion
  • Health
  • Food
    • Recipes
  • Travel
  • Investigations
  • Climate & Environment
  • World
  • Science & Technology
  • Interviews
  • Visual Stories
  • Crosswords & Sudoku
  • Horoscope
  • Forex
  • Corrections
  • Letters to the Editor
  • Today's ePaper
Wednesday, July 30, 2025

Without Fear or FavourUNWIND IN STYLE

25.09°C Kathmandu
Air Quality in Kathmandu: 39
300+Hazardous
0-50Good
51-100Moderate
101-150Unhealty for Sensitive Groups
151-200Unhealthy
201-300Very Unhealthy
Wed, Jul 30, 2025
25.09°C Kathmandu
Air Quality in Kathmandu: 39
  • What's News :

  • Nepal’s plan to lower marriage age
  • Nepal’s export boom
  • Nepal-India boundary works
  • Maternal deaths in Nepal
  • Division in Maoist Centre

National

Ordinance amends law on rape but fails to recognise rape of boy child and sexual minorities

Provision to legally recognise rape of only a woman or a girl child retained despite authorities wanting to change that provision to ‘person’. That could have had other implications. Ordinance amends law on rape but fails to recognise rape of boy child and sexual minorities
In this file photo, women lawmakers meet Ganesh Prasad Timilsina, chairperson of the National Assembly, seeking his support in incorporating severe penalties in cases of rape of minors and in the cases of murder after rape.  Photo Courtesy: Binda Pandey/Twitter
bookmark
  • facebook
  • twitter
  • Whatsapp
  • mail
Binod Ghimire
Published at : December 11, 2020
Updated at : December 11, 2020 07:55
Kathmandu

Ajita Bhujel, 29, a transwoman, was raped and murdered in Hetauda on January 18, 2020. Four persons were arrested but the police couldn’t book them on charges of rape as the existing law recognises the rape only of a girl or a woman.

“The four were sentenced only under murder charges,” said Pinky Gurung, chairperson of the Blue Diamond Society which advocates the rights of the sexual minorities. “We ask the government to revise the rape provisions in the criminal code after broad consultations.”

On Sunday President Bidya Devi Bhandari authenticated an ordinance published in the Nepal Gazette, the draft of which according to news reports had a provision which replaced “woman or girl child” of Clause 221 of the Criminal Code 2017 with “person” implying that both women or men could be raped.

“The provision was withdrawn after assessing that broader consultations are needed before redefining rape as it can have long-term implications,” Phanindra Gautam, spokesperson for the Ministry of Law and Justice, told the Post.

Women’s rights activists had criticised the draft ordinance saying it wasn’t empathetic towards the plight of the victims. They said that having a provision saying even men could be victims of rape could could further weaken the women rape victims’ fight for justice.

The ordinance had, following pressure from women lawmakers, revised existing laws to increase the penalty in the rape cases and, more importantly, book mediators who settle rape cases outside courts.

The ordinance, which has been enforced since Sunday, has provisions of six months to three years of jail term and a fine of Rs 30,000 for those who mediate to settle the rape case outside the court. Even those inciting mediation and putting pressure for out of court settlement for rape cases can face criminal charges.

If the victim is between 14 and 16 years old, the jail term has been increased to 12-16 years from the existing 12-14 years. If the victim is between 16 and 18 years old, the rapist can get 10-14 years jail term instead of 10-12 years. Similarly, if the victim is above 18 years, the perpetrator will be sentenced to 10-12 years in jail instead of the previous provision of 7-10 years.

There are no changes in the sentences for those raping a child below the age of 14. As per existing provisions, raping a child between 10 and 14 years will get 14-16 years of jail sentence while raping a child under 10 years will get 16-20 years in jail.

By the time the Cabinet endorsed the ordinance on November 22, according to officials at the Ministry of Law and Justice, any change in provisions on who could be raped had been left unaltered.

But Meera Dhungana, president of Forum for Women, Law and Development, a non-government organisation advocating the rights of women, contradicts assertions of the ministry officials saying that the provision was withdrawn before the authentication by Bhandari after widespread criticism.

“The Cabinet had endorsed the ordinance revising the existing provision,” she told the Post. “It was revised before the presidential seal following the criticism.”

Dhungana claimed this was the reason why the authentication took a long time. The ordinance was authenticated 16 days after endorsement by the Cabinet while it usually takes a few days.

Government officials claim that the provision had been incorporated earlier because of the need to categorise pedophile as rape.

“A number of male children have been victimised by pedophiles,” said Gautam. “The provision would define the crime as rape.”

As per the criminal code, a paedophile can be sentenced to prison for a maximum of 15 years.

Women rights activists, however, have a different take.

They say the government could have been specific by writing “boy child” instead of “person” in the original version of the ordinance.

“An adult male could file a case against a woman saying he was raped if the provision prevailed,” said Dhungana.

That would be against a precedent by the Supreme Court, which in 2011 said, a man cannot be raped by a woman.

While women’s rights campaigners say the clear legal provision to punish those who perpetrate the crime of rape on a woman and a girl child is a step forward, those of the community of sexual minorities remain unhappy.

They would not be satisfied with replacing “woman or a girl child” by the word “person” alone, according to Gurung of the Blue Diamond Society.

“There has to be specific provisions in the laws addressing the issues of the LGBTI community,” said Gurung. “The word person is vague and people in administration can define it the way they like.”

Gurung says even third-gender people can fall victim to rape but sexual minorities are facing problems in filing such cases as the present law doesn’t recognise that as a crime under the existing discriminatory law.

“The government didn’t consult us while drafting the ordinance,” Gurung said.  


Binod Ghimire

Binod Ghimire covers parliamentary affairs and human rights for The Kathmandu Post. Since joining the Post in 2010, he has reported primarily on social issues, focusing on education and transitional justice.


Related News

Bagmati Chief Minister Lama appoints three ministers amid deepening intra-party rift
Bhotekoshi flood blocks Syaphrubesi–Rasuwagadhi road again
Flood in Bhotekoshi river prompts alert for low-lying areas
Nepal, India to finish boundary work in three years, barring Kalapani and Susta
UN panel backs Nepal’s plan to relax marriage age bar
Arghakhanchi farmer uses CCTV to outsmart crop-raiding monkeys

Most Read from National

Nepal bans Telegram over online fraud concerns
Missing sisters found dead in Bhaktapur
Open-air jet repair exposes Kathmandu airport’s limitations
60 percent of jar water samples collected from Godawari found contaminated with faecal coliform
US pulls MCC Nepal Compact back from the brink

Editor's Picks

Kailash pilgrims breathe new life into Nepal’s mountain economy
Pressure groups are dictating lawmaking
Indians paying by QR in Nepal for a year but Nepalis still lack access in India
UML weighs binning age, term limits amid Oli-Bhandari rivalry
Law in the works to check officials’ conflict of interest

E-PAPER | July 30, 2025

  • Read ePaper Online
×
ABOUT US
  • About the Post
  • Masthead
  • Editorial Standards & Integrity
  • Workplace Harassment Policy
  • Privacy Policy
READ US
  • Home Delivery
  • ePaper
CONTACT US
  • Write for the Post
  • Letters to the Editor
  • Advertise in the Post
  • Work for the Post
  • Send us a tip
INTERACT WITH US
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
OUR SISTER PUBLICATIONS
  • eKantipur
  • saptahik
  • Nepal
  • Nari
  • Radio Kantipur
  • Kantipur TV
© 2025 www.kathmandupost.com
  • Privacy Policy
Top