Political processes in Nepal are now increasingly being influenced by networks of greed.

The new round of political surprises can push forward political realignment.

Neither elections nor revolution is a solution to the current problems.

An apparent conflict has emerged because our foreign policies have not changed with the times.

The appeal of the monarchy and a Hindu force can backfire, as they frequently disavow the principles of inclusion and democracy.

When political leaders lack concrete ideology, they often take recourse to ideas of development and stability.

It is time to move beyond the idea of political stability to the idea of constitutional stability.

The prime minister may be down but is not out. Further conflict between claimants to power will cost us more.

Reopening cities requires a careful balance between preventive measures and a gradual opening of essential activities.

Nepal will have to debate and talk about our ideas about the nation-state.

If Nepal is to develop, we must ensure a transition to the rule of law in the economy as well.

Cleavages can generate a visceral emotional response; they override people’s concern for democracy and human rights.

Prime Minister Oli opened too many battlefronts, now he may be succumbing to his own ambitions.

Policies, disguised as legitimate efforts to serve the public interest, are designed to serve financial interests.

Revitalising the party would threaten the interests of these leaders and dismantle the mechanisms through which they accumulate power and money.