The question confronting the Nepal Bar Association today is whether its members should practise law or politics.

The institutionalisation of federal intervention will erode provincial democracy and autonomy.

Attitude towards federalism in Nepal is still marked with scepticism.

Will President Paudel violate constitutional provisions if they are contrary to Cabinet recommendations?

Never forget that judiciary without accountability can be a threat to an independent judiciary.

Many constitutional disputes presented before the Supreme Court show political and legal character.

China’s statement that Pokhara airport is under the BRI has legitimate justifications.

The dispute between Axiata (and Ncell) and Nepal revolves around purported treaty breaches.

Nepal will be confronted on the international arena for inviting the present imbroglio.

Justices eyeing plum positions during or after active service risk eroding the independence of the judiciary.

International adjudicatory settings have traditionally been hesitant to place legal value on maps.

After more than a generation of false starts, Nepal’s highly touted hydropower sector has at long last taken its first stuttering steps towards realising its world beating 80,000 MW potential.

Given Nepal’s enormous infrastructure gap, its lack of political will and consensus to develop large infrastructure facilities confounds rational thought.

Post-disaster procurement should not be a recipe for corruption despite the need for urgency

In the churning over federalism, discussions over a federal capital have been resigned to the sidelines