What's News :
BRI implementation plan
Durga Prasai
Wildlife conservation
Antimicrobial resistance in Nepal
Tourism in Bandipur
Book talk

Tree felling drive courts controversy in Parbat

Kushma Municipality had decided to cut down trees, arguing that jungles had increased risks of wildlife in the settlement areas. Tree felling drive courts controversy in Parbat

Residents have been protesting against the local units’ drive, arguing that it has taken a toll on the ecosystem. POST PHOTO: Agandhar Tiwari

bookmark

facebook
twitter
Whatsapp
mail

Agandhar Tiwari

Published at : February 3, 2020

Updated at : February 3, 2020 08:54

Parbat

In November last year, a few wards in Kushma Municipality started a drive to fell trees that covered the settlements. Three months later, the neighbouring Phalewas Municipality followed suit. After the locals reacted positively, all the wards decided to chop down the trees. A year later, the decision has courted controversy, with the locals protesting against the decision.

Kushma Municipality had decided to cut down trees, arguing that jungles had increased risks of wildlife in the settlement areas. Every big tree within a distance of 25m from a house was felled. Some ward offices even issued warnings that anyone unwilling to do so within 45 days would be deprived of the local unit’s facilities. But the locals argued that the drive is not mentioned anywhere in law and was decided on a whim by the municipality. Bowing to pressure, Kushma Municipality stopped the drive.

Phalewas too stopped the drive, but the locals didn’t obey the local unit’s ruling and geared up to fell trees. They chopped down trees that were within a distance of 20metres from residences and five metres from latrines. Today, the same locals are venting ire, arguing that the drive has taken a toll on greenery and ecosystem. They say the drive has destroyed trees such as banyan and peepal, and also fruit trees.

Phalewas Mayor Padampani Sharma has denied that the drive has received ire from the local community, but the locals have been outspoken in protesting the local unit’s decision.

“The municipality’s decision might backfire, especially as the local unit hasn’t taken the importance of ecosystem seriously,” Bishwa Sigdel, a local, wrote on Facebook.

“In the name of protecting settlements, the local unit has also destroyed chautaris, the epitome of Hindu culture and history,” Rajendra Bhandari, another local, said.

Ashok Kumar Shrestha, chief of the Division Forest Office, said that his office has received numerous complaints against the drive lately. “We are investigating into the matter,” he said.

The Gandaki Provincial Government last year introduced an act regarding the conservation and management of banyan and peepal trees. According to the act, it is the local unit’s responsibility to preserve those trees that have a connection to Hindu mythology. If the trees need to be displaced, they should be replaced with other saplings, according to the act. Kushma’s local units, however, have not introduced any such plans as yet.